Ceramics Today
Home | Articles | CT Update | Gallery | Contact | Search
 
Links A-Z
Articles

An Investigation into the Properties of Porcelain Paperclay
Gaye Stevens describes her research project dealing with paperclay and its possibilities

Originally published in Ceramics Art & Perception.

Photographic Imprints

Initial trials of imprinting the porcelain body with ceramic stamps were effective. The clay held the imprint crisply and I was encouraged to think that a photographic image would be possible if the right type of ‘stamp’ (plate) could be found. I had used solar etching plates to produce photographic etchings in printmaking and thought it might be possible to use such a plate to imprint the clay. Unfortunately, the solar plate was unsuitable for this process because the light sensitive emulsion on the plate was unable to maintain the sustained contact with the clay body necessary to imprint it. The emulsion absorbed moisture from the clay body, expanded and separated from the backing plate. The resilience of the high cellulose content in the body also prevented it from being able to hold the fine imprint to any degree that would produce an effective image.

Rolling PaperclayIn a photographic exhibition of work by Jenny Pollack and Louis Vidal, entitled ‘Passages’, (Customs House Sydney, November 2000) I saw embossed photocopies of photographs that had been produced to make a tactile, readable surface for people with impaired vision. These photocopies are produced with a special heat-sensitive paper which when passed through a PIAF machine reacts to raise the areas printed with ink to give a kind of Braille photocopy. With the help of Michael Keighery at the University of Western Sydney, Milperra, I was able to produce a photographic 3D image. By using a printing press, I imprinted this image into a standard clay body and the imprint was sharp and readable. When I repeated the process with the porcelain paperclay the resilience of the cellulose once again reduced the clarity of the image. I discovered that by allowing the paperclay mix to age (at least one month), this resilience was reduced and the readability of the image improved, but the results read more as a silhouette than a photographic image.

An article in Ceramic Review May/June 2001 presented research by Helen Smith at the University of the West of England on the potential of using flexography to emboss paperclay with a photographic image.

Further inquires within the printing industry led me to a du Pont product named Cyrel®. This proved to be just what I was searching for. Cyrel® is a flexible vinyl plate of approximately 10 mm thickness to which a photographic image can be transferred by placing a photographic transparency on the plate and exposing it to intense UV light. The process duplicates even the minutest detail and the resulting stamp-like plate will effectively imprint the porcelain paperclay.

I roll the clay to a similar thickness to the Cyrel plate, spray the top of the slab with a fine mist of water and smooth the surface with a plastic ruler. I then leave it to a dry leatherhard state and use a rolling pin to imprint the clay with the plate. By drying the imprinted slab slowly over a few days I avoid any warping. The slab is then fired slowly on a flat even bed of white silica sand in an electric kiln to cone 8.

The fired porcelain paperclay is porous and fragile. As Steve Harrison suggests, it can be painted with acrylic medium to give it strength and flexibility and the medium gives the surface an almost imperceptible lustre. Early results have been most encouraging, to my mind opening up enormous possibilities for future development.

3D Forms

In my initial attempts to produce three-dimensional forms, I experimented with various construction and firing techniques and although the paperclay was effective at the construction stage, immense care had to be taken during drying to avoid warping. I found the most effective construction technique was to work with leather hard or even totally dry slabs that had been cut to the desired shape with a sharp blade and to join them with a slightly drier than normal paper porcelain slip. It was also possible to roll partially dried slabs into cylindrical forms. However, during firing, even with meticulously built supports, the forms warped slightly and although in some cases this was acceptable, it was too ‘organic’ for the type of form I wished to produce at this point.

For my purposes, I overcame this weakness by constructing the forms after firing. In the first instance where I wanted to convey a sense of precariousness and tension, and the fragility of sanctuary, I layered the sheets to create the 3D form. In another piece that addresses the effort that must go into the construction of sanctuary, I perforated the edges of the sheets and sewed them together. The results have been rewarding, to my mind embodying all the fragility and vulnerability I had hoped to convey.

Porcelain paperclay while challenging traditional methods of production, has presented possibilities for my studio practice. The edges possible with this body, its translucency and affinity for light, and its seeming fragility are qualities I intend to investigate further.

Because of the health hazards associated with ceramic fibre and dry paper pulp, it is essential to use a facemask and gloves while mixing this body. Mix the clay in an area with sufficient ventilation and when touching the ceramic fibre, cover as much of your body as possible with protective clothing.

Previous > Introduction to Paperclay

Gaye Stevens is a M Des(Hons) candidate at the College of Fine Arts, University of New South Wales, Australia. Supervisor: Jacqueline Clayton.

 


© Ceramics Today